Search

Loading

If you find the information within this blog useful please take the time to support the site and visit one of the Google advertisers.


Share

21 May 2010

CSV FDA Warning Letters : Qualification



Date: 27 April 2009
Link: FDA Warning Letter (New Window)

Observation

8. Failure to maintain a written record and appropriate validation data of computer or other automated processes used to perform calculations in connection with laboratory analysis [21 CFR 211.68(b)]. Refer to FDA 483, Observation 12. For example, the accuracy of calculations performed by the [(b)(4)] Spectrophotometer has not been verified.

Comments

This is a typical failing within the validation of standard laboratory instrumentation, the failure to provide documented evidence that the software performs within specification.
Whenever possible the supplier, as the Subject Matter Experts (SME) should be employed to provide this documented evidence, either at the factory or during the on site qualification.
An alternative method of ensuring quality could include a Supplier Quality Audit, with verification over the suppliers design, source code review process and testing. While this does not provide direct testing it provides sufficient relative quality assurance that the laboratory instrument is fit for purpose.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments on the computer systems validation blog are welcome.

Share